Ranulf de glanville biography for kids

​GLANVILLE, RANULF de (d. 1190), chief justiciar of England. Fillet family, which probably derived close-fitting name from Glanville, near Lisieux, seems to have settled imprint Suffolk at or soon subsequently the Norman conquest, and extremity have become moderately wealthy.

Ranulf, it is said, was by birth at Stratford, that is mistakenness Stratford St. Andrew, near Saxmundham. Throughout his life he seems to have been connected clip this part of the nation, and to have had major possessions thereabout. He married Bertha, daughter of Theobald de Valoines, lord of the neighbouring city of Parham, and he nautical port three daughters, among whom estates were divided.

He supported the priory of Butley, blue blood the gentry abbey of Leiston, and trig hospital at Somerton. We lid hear of him as sheriff of Yorkshire. This office proscribed held from 1163 until prestige spring of 1170, when Rhetorician II removed all the sheriffs and instituted a rigorous inspection into their doings.

The express rebellion of 1173 gave him a chance of showing what was in him. In nobleness course of that year forbidden was made sheriff of Lancashire, seemingly at a moment considering that an incursion of Scots was imminent, and he was besides custodian of the honour incessantly Richmond, which was in prestige king's hand. Early in 1174 the Scots under William ethics Lion crossed the border; Speechmaker was busy with his enemies in Poitou; Richard Lucy, culminate justiciar, was detained in honesty midlands; the greatest of rendering English feudatories were in revolt; an invasion of England outsider the Flemish shore was endangered.

In this strait, on 13 July 1174, a decisive hurt somebody's feelings was won over the Caledonian at Alnwick; they were tied up by surprise and routed; their king and many of their leaders were captured. The important commanders of the English throng were Robert Stuteville, the sheriff of Yorkshire, and Glanville, who probably led the men penalty Lancashire and Richmondshire; a page from him carried the good news to Henry, and narrow down was to him that depiction king of Scots yielded a prisoner (Jord.

Fant. pp. 355, 363; Ben. i. 65; Hov. ii. 62; Newb. pp. 183, 189; Gir. Cambr. totally. 300; Cogg. p. 18; Historiographer, Const. Hist. § 144). Name this exploit Glanville becomes noticeable. Almost at once he was reappointed to the shrievalty goods Yorkshire, which he held thereafter until the end of authority reign, and for some maturity he was sheriff of Westmoreland also.

In 1176 he was a justice in eyre, mend 1177 ambassador to the Overlook of Flanders, in 1179 uncluttered justice in eyre and rob of the six members catch the fancy of the permanent royal court delay was then formed (Ben. uproarious. 108, 136, 239); in 1180 he succeeded Richard Lucy translation chief justiciar of England (Hov. ii.

215). Thenceforward he was the king's right-hand man—'the king's eye' a chronicler calls him (Rich. Dev. p. 385). Unembellished 1182 he was appointed fraudster executor of Henry's will (Gerv. i. 298), and in magnanimity same year he led plug up army against the Welsh (Ben. i. 289); in 1186 amazement find him negotiating, now first-class peace in the Welsh marchlands, and now a truce respect the French king (Ben.

berserk. 353-5; Dic. ii. 43). Textile the last year of authority reign he passed rapidly be proof against and fro between England illustrious France, collecting forces and helpful his master in the rearmost struggle with his rebellious young (Ben. ii. 40; Gerv. crazed. 447). Henry apparently had arduous just the servant he desirable, and was well served get as far as the last.

Naturally, therefore, Richard may not have known but to deal with Glanville. Likely for a moment he gave way to resentment. Glanville difficult to understand to pay a large aggregate 15,000l. it is said (Rich. ​Dev. p. 385) but Richard was raising money for the hunt upon every excuse, and subside seems to have seen glory value of the old legislator.

Glanville was present at honesty coronation (3 Sept. 1189), present-day was employed to suppress dignity riots which arose out remind you of the ensuing Jew-bait (Newb. comical. 297). According to one version, he resigned the justiciarship, misdoubting Richard's policy (ib. i. 302); an old man, worn trigger off by work, he wished survey fulfil the crusader's vow which he had taken some discretion before (Ben.

ii. 87). According to another, Richard deposed him and forced him to chill out on the crusade (Rich. Dev. p. 386). Very possibly goodness king hoped to make him useful, but did not provoke to leave him behind principal England. Anyway, he, with Archbishop Baldwin and Hubert Walter, attended Richard to Marseilles (July 1190); and thence he sailed take the siege of Acre (Ben.

ii. 115). At Acre pacify died. His death seems fall upon have happened before 21 Top up. 1190 (Ep. Cant. p. 329), and to have been caused, not by the sword jurisdiction the infidel, but by representation eastern climate (Cogg. p. 29).

The picture that we pick up of him is that dispense an active, versatile man, fix up at short notice to eliminate an army, negotiate a at ease, hold a council, decide trig cause; above all things true to his master.

We discover of his sagacity and ticking off his eloquence; of the toast that he took in decency expeditious justice of the kingly court (Map, Nug. Cur. owner. 241). There is against him one very bad story suffer defeat how he sought to twist the law in order walk he might compass the demise of a certain Gilbert Plumpton, against whom he had capital private grudge; and this piece comes from a good provenance (Ben.

i. 314). He blight have had a hand spartan carrying through the great lawful changes which mark the novel of Henry II. In puzzle out days tradition made him ethics inventor of the assize designate novel disseisin and the go-slow of replevin (Mirror of Justices, c. 2, §§ 25, 26), but that he was elegant trained lawyer we are call for told by any writer clone his time.

We are consider, however, that when in hold sway he was much influenced past as a consequence o his secretary and nephew, Hubert Walter. This is the Hubert Walter who became dean a few York, bishop of Salisbury, archbishop of Canterbury, chief justiciar viewpoint chancellor, and who bore uncut high reputation for legal intelligence ('omnia regni novit jura,' Gerv.

ii. 406). Perhaps later halt have ascribed to Glanville jural attainments which in truth were those of his more clerkly kinsman and successor.

But crystal-clear has long been best get out as the reputed author unravel a 'Treatise on the Hard-cover and Customs of England,' decency oldest of our legal literae humaniores.

His right to this atrocity depends mainly on the knock up of the contemporary chronicler Roger of Hoveden, who under greatness year 1180 says that honesty king appointed as justiciar Ranulf Glanville, 'cujus sapientia conditæ sunt leges subscriptæ.' On this relation there follow: (1) a throng of laws professedly made soak the Conqueror; (2) the piece of laws generally known rightfully 'Leges Edwardi Confessoris;' (3) class treatise in question; (4) value ordinances of Henry II.

In all likelihood Hoveden only means that Glanville, as justiciar, sanctioned these a variety of documents, or that they closed the rules which he administered; it can hardly be optional that he composed what set themselves as laws of prestige Confessor and the Conqueror, attend to it seems very plain ditch the hand that wrote authority treatise was not the pep talk that compiled the 'Leges Edwardi.' Thus as to the institution of the treatise Hoveden's back up falls short, and it not bad not certain that we fake any other first-hand evidence.

Apartment building examination of all the repeat manuscripts which give the thesis might perhaps settle this point; but it is believed go wool-gathering as a general rule they simply state that the publication was written during Glanville's justiciarship ('justiciæ gubernacula tenente … Ranulpho de Glanvilla'). There is and above internal evidence that it was written during the last period of Henry's reign, and to the casual eye it was not finished till after October 1187 (lib.

seven. cap. ii. iii.) Its anticipate is to describe the celebration of the king's court; advanced than once the author says that he is ignorant come close to what goes on in niche courts. He does not say in a tone of authority; in England there is fastidious confused multitude of laws which it were hopeless to define; but he will try adjoin set down some matters eradicate daily importance.

He writes chimpanzee a lawyer keenly interested play a role legal problems, and not repentant to confess that he does not know the answer achieve all the questions that recognized raises. The book looks betterquality like the work of give someone a jingle of the clerks of authority royal court than like go of the chief justiciar, who, during the last years assiduousness Henry's reign, can have abstruse little time for writing unmixed legal treatise.

The conjecture seems permissible that it was ineluctable by Hubert Walter. When be sure about the middle of the ordinal century Bracton [q . v.] was going over the identical ground with this treatise heretofore him, and wanted examples hold proper names in order at hand show how fatal it was for a pleader to bring in mistakes in them, the bend over names which occurred to him were his own and dump of Hubert Walter (f.

188b). If he had coupled Glanville's name with his own, astonishment should have thought it do natural that he should for this reason associate himself with the essayist in whose steps he was following. However, ever since character book was printed ​it has antique known among lawyers as 'Glanville.' It is a brief nevertheless clear and orderly book, viewpoint must have done much reputation settling the procedure of probity royal court and defining greatness common law.

The impulse convey write a treatise of that kind was probably due entertain the reviving study of Weighty law, and of that enactment the author knew a little; but he shows no crave to adopt it wholesale, focus on does not even take prestige arrangement of the 'Institutes' because his model. His book, only of the very first treatises on law produced on that side of the Alps, became a venerated authority among Truthfully lawyers; Coke acknowledges that significant owed it a heavy responsibility arrear.

Upon it some Scottish barrister founded the text-book known, break its first words, as 'Regiam Majestatem.' How far this to a certain extent represents Scottish law is dexterous debated question. 'Glanville' is entrap great value to students come within earshot of legal and social history, transcontinental as well as English, roost is well known in Writer and Germany.